China claims Sri Lankan claim on Hambantota port false

China claims Sri Lankan claim on Hambantota port false

BEIJING:  China on Wednesday said that the news quoted by Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunvardhana was "contrary to the facts" that the controversial agreement to take the port of Hambantota to 99 years extended the lease period by so many more years Provision of Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardhana has revealed that the predecessor government led by Maithripala Sirisena gave Hambantota port to China on a 99-year lease and there was a provision to extend the lease for a further 99 years.

The Sri Lankan newspaper 'Ceylon Today' reported this on 20 February, citing quality. When asked about this, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said that the port of Hambantota is an important project that China and Sri Lanka are jointly building under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Asked about whether China has opposed renegotiating the agreement by the Sri Lankan government, he said, "The related news is contrary to the facts".  


Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

National Desk: The Punjab and Haryana High Court shattered Palvinder Kaur's dream of marrying Prince Harry of Britain. A lawyer by profession, Palvinder Kaur herself appeared in the case to plead her case and demanded legal action, arrest warrant against Prince Harry for not fulfilling his promise to marry. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan's court expressed sympathy for the female lawyer but dismissed her petition on 8 April.

The judge said, "After hearing the talk of the petitioner, I feel the impulse to marry Prince Harry rather than this petition." He even said that it might be said that Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in a village in Punjab. This alleged promise regarding marriage was made through an e-mail from a female lawyer. The petitioners are also confused about the names and have merged their name with the name of Kate Middleton, sister-in-law of Prince Harry. The female lawyer has called for action against Prince Harry Middleton, son of UK-based Prince Charles Middleton. 

The woman has requested the court to direct the British police to take action against Harry. He also demanded an arrest warrant against Prince Harry so that there would be no delay in his marriage. But all these arguments had no effect on the single bench. The judge said in his judgment, "This petition is very bad both from the point of view of grammar and knowledge of request and it refers to an email between the petitioner and Prince Harry, in which the said person promised to get married soon by sending an email." Have done The court asked the petitioner if she had gone to Britain, then she said that no she has not gone. The petitioner said that the conversation took place through social media and he has also sent a message to Prince Charles that he is engaged to his son. 

The judge said, "It is well known that frauds are opened on social media sites like Facebook, Twitter etc. and this court cannot rely on the veracity of such conversations." He said, there is every possibility that this so-called Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in the village of Punjab and is looking for good prospects for himself. The court said, "The court has not found any basis for taking cognizance of this petition and can only sympathize with the petitioner that he has accepted such fake conversation as true." Therefore, the petition is dismissed.