PAK Army confesses - its officers fired dangerous Taliban terrorist

PAK Army confesses - its officers fired dangerous Taliban terrorist

Islamabad: The Pakistan Army's new act of promoting terrorism has emerged. A Karaf Pakistan government is trying to escape the Black List of Financial Action Task Force (FATF), while on the other hand its army is engaged in exterminating terrorists. Officials of the Pakistan Army have helped the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) terrorist, who had been plotting to target Malala Yusufzai in 2012, to escape. This was also officially confirmed in the statement by Major General Babar Iftikhar, Chief of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Army.

He said that action has been taken against the officials of the "Intelligence Department" responsible for the former Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan's escape from the army custody last year. Arrested in 2017, Ehsan escaped from another alleged "safe house" in January 2020. Major General Babar Iftikhar, a spokesman for the army's media wing, said, "It was a very serious matter and those responsible for it were punished after a detailed investigation."

"Efforts are on to capture the favor again, but we are not aware of his whereabouts at the moment," he said. The spokesperson did not provide any information about the officials responsible for the incident and what penalty they were given. Babar said that Eshaan's escape from custody is a matter of serious concern, and a detailed investigation has been taken against the culprits. He said that efforts are underway to arrest Ehsan but it is not yet known where he is. According to a report Ahsan is currently in Turkey. 


Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

National Desk: The Punjab and Haryana High Court shattered Palvinder Kaur's dream of marrying Prince Harry of Britain. A lawyer by profession, Palvinder Kaur herself appeared in the case to plead her case and demanded legal action, arrest warrant against Prince Harry for not fulfilling his promise to marry. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan's court expressed sympathy for the female lawyer but dismissed her petition on 8 April.

The judge said, "After hearing the talk of the petitioner, I feel the impulse to marry Prince Harry rather than this petition." He even said that it might be said that Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in a village in Punjab. This alleged promise regarding marriage was made through an e-mail from a female lawyer. The petitioners are also confused about the names and have merged their name with the name of Kate Middleton, sister-in-law of Prince Harry. The female lawyer has called for action against Prince Harry Middleton, son of UK-based Prince Charles Middleton. 

The woman has requested the court to direct the British police to take action against Harry. He also demanded an arrest warrant against Prince Harry so that there would be no delay in his marriage. But all these arguments had no effect on the single bench. The judge said in his judgment, "This petition is very bad both from the point of view of grammar and knowledge of request and it refers to an email between the petitioner and Prince Harry, in which the said person promised to get married soon by sending an email." Have done The court asked the petitioner if she had gone to Britain, then she said that no she has not gone. The petitioner said that the conversation took place through social media and he has also sent a message to Prince Charles that he is engaged to his son. 

The judge said, "It is well known that frauds are opened on social media sites like Facebook, Twitter etc. and this court cannot rely on the veracity of such conversations." He said, there is every possibility that this so-called Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in the village of Punjab and is looking for good prospects for himself. The court said, "The court has not found any basis for taking cognizance of this petition and can only sympathize with the petitioner that he has accepted such fake conversation as true." Therefore, the petition is dismissed.