Xi Jinping's big preparations: Identification of loyalists now, waged 'purification' campaign

Xi Jinping's big preparations: Identification of loyalists now, waged 'purification' campaign

Beijing: China has a deep gulf between the general public and those at the peak of power, but President Xi Jinping wants to fill the gap. For this, they are running reforms like Mao's Comprehensive Cleanliness Campaign. The President is appealing to his senior officials to clean up the mess of Chinese politics and purify it with Karen.

Jinping's term ending in 2023

However, this is not going to be easy. Because almost every week new scams emerge, the gap between the ruling Communist Party of China and the general public is increasing. Indeed, Jinping's term is about to end in 2023, in such a situation he has launched a Purification Campaign to maintain a hold on China's power.

On 27 February, the party announced this

On 27 February last, the Communist Party has announced that it will launch the much-awaited purification campaign. Under this campaign, work will be done to identify those who are not loyal to the party and Xi Jinping. At the same time, it is being said that it is said to be the biggest campaign to run in the domestic security system after 1990.

Mao also ran a similar campaign

The campaign will ascertain whether agencies like police, secret police, judiciary and prisons are completely loyal and credible to the government. The Communist Party's purification campaign is similar to the reform campaign in the early 1940s. At that time, the then leader of the Communist Party, Mao, undertook a comprehensive cleaning campaign. It is important that after 1990 in China, the need for another such campaign was being told.


Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

Prince Harry did not fulfill the promise of marriage, the woman reached the Punjab court, know what happened then

National Desk: The Punjab and Haryana High Court shattered Palvinder Kaur's dream of marrying Prince Harry of Britain. A lawyer by profession, Palvinder Kaur herself appeared in the case to plead her case and demanded legal action, arrest warrant against Prince Harry for not fulfilling his promise to marry. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan's court expressed sympathy for the female lawyer but dismissed her petition on 8 April.

The judge said, "After hearing the talk of the petitioner, I feel the impulse to marry Prince Harry rather than this petition." He even said that it might be said that Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in a village in Punjab. This alleged promise regarding marriage was made through an e-mail from a female lawyer. The petitioners are also confused about the names and have merged their name with the name of Kate Middleton, sister-in-law of Prince Harry. The female lawyer has called for action against Prince Harry Middleton, son of UK-based Prince Charles Middleton. 

The woman has requested the court to direct the British police to take action against Harry. He also demanded an arrest warrant against Prince Harry so that there would be no delay in his marriage. But all these arguments had no effect on the single bench. The judge said in his judgment, "This petition is very bad both from the point of view of grammar and knowledge of request and it refers to an email between the petitioner and Prince Harry, in which the said person promised to get married soon by sending an email." Have done The court asked the petitioner if she had gone to Britain, then she said that no she has not gone. The petitioner said that the conversation took place through social media and he has also sent a message to Prince Charles that he is engaged to his son. 

The judge said, "It is well known that frauds are opened on social media sites like Facebook, Twitter etc. and this court cannot rely on the veracity of such conversations." He said, there is every possibility that this so-called Prince Harry is sitting in a cyber cafe in the village of Punjab and is looking for good prospects for himself. The court said, "The court has not found any basis for taking cognizance of this petition and can only sympathize with the petitioner that he has accepted such fake conversation as true." Therefore, the petition is dismissed.